This is how it’s done, isn’t it? White supremacists are depicted as violent and dangerous. Tea Party associates are described as “violent right-wing nut-jobs” and as being guilty of sedition. But how is it, REALLY?
This tactic is straight out of Alinsky’s “Rules for Radicals.”
- “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, polarize it. Don’t try to attack abstract corporations or bureaucracies. Identify a responsible individual. Ignore attempts to shift or spread the blame.”
- “In war, the end justifies almost any means.”
The dead lawyer might not meet with your approval due to his racial beliefs. But HE didn’t do murder. There isn’t any record of illegality or violence on his part. We probably wouldn’t want either one of these dudes living next door to us, but if I had to make a choice, I would choose the guy with the white hood, not the one with the machete. Which one would YOU choose?